tests/create-update-pr.bats (2)

184-187: Consider more robust commit message validation.

The test uses partial string matching rather than validating the complete structure or individual lines. This approach was flagged in previous reviews as potentially missing format issues.

As suggested in previous reviews, consider validating the complete message structure or verifying each line individually to ensure the commit message format is exactly as expected.

---

318-322: Consider more robust PR body validation.

Similar to the commit message test, this validation only checks for partial string matches rather than verifying the complete structure. Previous reviews suggested validating specific sections to ensure the full template is properly formatted.

As noted in previous reviews, consider adding assertions for specific sections (Changes, Artifacts, Source) with their complete expected content to ensure the PR body template is correctly formatted.

tests/create-update-pr.bats (3)

1-22: Consider enhancing file header documentation.

Per coding guidelines, the file header could include more comprehensive documentation:

• Overview of testing approach (mock file system for remote branch simulation)
• Dependencies (bats, git)
• Test environment setup details

🔎 Example enhanced header

 #!/usr/bin/env bats
 
-# Tests for create-update-pr.sh
-# This test file validates the PR creation and git operations logic
+# ========== Test Suite: create-update-pr.sh ==========
+#
+# Purpose: Validates PR creation workflow and git operations
+#
+# Overview:
+#   - Tests branch naming, git configuration, and artifact handling
+#   - Uses mock file system to simulate remote branch operations
+#   - Validates commit messages, PR body generation, and error handling
+#
+# Dependencies:
+#   - bats-core: Test framework
+#   - git: Version control operations
+#
+# Test Approach:
+#   - Creates temporary git repository for each test
+#   - Uses .remote_branches directory to mock remote state
+#   - Tests logic in isolation rather than full script integration

Based on coding guidelines for shell scripts.

---

31-54: Helper functions use mocking rather than actual git commands.

The helper functions simulate remote branch operations using a mock file system (.remote_branches directory) rather than testing actual git ls-remote and git push --delete commands. This unit testing approach validates the logic in isolation but doesn't verify that the actual git commands work as expected.

Consider adding integration tests that execute the actual create-update-pr.sh script with a real remote repository (e.g., using a local bare git repository as a mock remote). This would catch issues like:

• Git command syntax errors
• Authentication/permission problems
• Network error handling
• Exit code handling from git commands

The current mock-based tests are still valuable for fast unit testing of logic, so both approaches could coexist.

Would you like me to generate an example integration test setup using a local bare repository as a mock remote?

---

56-323: Consider adding section headers for improved organization.

Per coding guidelines for shell scripts, section headers like # ========== Section Name ========== can improve readability by demarcating main code blocks. With 19 test cases, grouping them into logical sections would make the file easier to navigate.

Example organization with section headers

# ========== Branch Management Tests ==========
@test "generates correct branch name from version" { ... }
@test "creates new branch correctly" { ... }
@test "handles version strings with dots and numbers correctly" { ... }

# ========== Remote Branch Conflict Resolution Tests ==========
@test "detects when remote branch exists" { ... }
@test "detects when remote branch does not exist" { ... }
@test "deletes remote branch when it exists" { ... }
@test "handles remote branch conflict by deleting existing branch" { ... }

# ========== Git Configuration Tests ==========
@test "configures git with bot identity correctly" { ... }

# ========== Artifact Handling Tests ==========
@test "validates artifacts directory structure" { ... }
@test "stages correct files for commit" { ... }
@test "calculates SHA256 checksum correctly" { ... }

# ========== Message Generation Tests ==========
@test "generates correct commit message format" { ... }
@test "generates PR body with correct information" { ... }

# ========== Cleanup and Navigation Tests ==========
@test "removes temporary PR body file after use" { ... }
@test "returns to original branch after operations" { ... }

# ========== Error Handling Tests ==========
@test "detects missing ARM64 package file" { ... }

Based on coding guidelines for shell scripts.

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Learnt from: CR
Repo: yellow-seed/brew_mozc PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:39:16.748Z
Learning: Follow a development workflow: confirm Issue understanding, create feature/fix branches, implement changes, run tests, create Pull Requests, and merge after review